| |
Indiana Farmland Values & Cash Rents Continue
to Increase
Dr. Craig L. Dobbins and Kim
A. Cook
The June 2003 Purdue Land Values Survey found that on a statewide basis bare
Indiana cropland ranged in value from $1,966 to $3,035. These values are based
on 323 surveys received from professionals that are knowledgeable of Indiana's
farmland market. Poor land had an estimated value of $1,966 per acre, average
land had an estimated value of $2,509 per acre, and top land had an estimated
value of $3,035 per acre (Table 1). For the 12month period ending in June
2003, this was an increase of 5.2%, 5.3% and 4.9%, respectively for poor,
average, and top land.
Part the difference in land values reflects productivity differences. As a
measure of productivity, survey respondents were asked to estimate longterm corn yields. The average reported yield was 103,
134, and 163 bushels per acre, respectively for poor, average, and top quality
land. The value per bushel for different land qualities was very similar. Poor
land was the most expensive at $19.07 per bushel. Top land had the lowest value
at $18.59 per bushel and average land was $18.79 per bushel.
The average value of transition land* increased this year, reversing
the decline that occurred in last year's survey. The average value of
transition land in June 2003 was $6,936 per acre, an increase of 7.6% from June
2002. Due to the wide variation in estimates for transitional land, the median
value** may give a more meaningful picture than the arithmetic average. The
median value of transitional land in June 2003 was $5,500 per acre.
Statewide Rents
Cash rents increased statewide from 2002 to 2003 by $2 to $4 per acre
(Table 2). The estimated cash rent was $147 per acre on top land, $120 per
acre on average land, and $93 per acre on poor land. This was an increase in
rental rates of 2.2% for poor land, 3.4% for average land, and 2.8% for top
land. Rent per bushel of estimated corn yield was $0.90 per bushel for all land
classes. Cash rent as a percentage of value continued to decline. For top and
average farmland, cash rent as a percentage of farmland value was 4.8%. For
poor farmland, cash rent as a percentage of farmland was 4.7%. These values are
the lowest achieved in 27 year history of the Purdue Land Value Survey.
Area Land
Values
Changes in the value of farmland in the six different geographic areas of Indiana
(Figure 1) for December 2002 to June 2003 ranged from a 2.1%
increase for poor land in the Central region to a 4.5% increase
for average land in the Southwest region (Table 1). All regions
of the state reported strong increases in farmland values for
this sixmonth period. The strongest
region was the Southwest with increases ranging from 3.4% to 4.5%.
Figure 1.
|
|
Table 1. Average estimated Indiana land
value per acre (tillable, bare land) and per bushel of
corn yield, percentage change by geographical area and
land class, selected time periods, Purdue Land Values
Survey, June 20031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
Top
|
162
|
2,784
|
2,921
|
3,037
|
|
9.1%
|
4.0%
|
|
17.44
|
18.79
|
7.7%
|
|
3,096
|
1.9%
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
130
|
2,243
|
2,337
|
2,419
|
|
7.8%
|
3.5%
|
|
17.51
|
18.59
|
6.2%
|
|
2,464
|
1.9%
|
|
|
|
|
Poor
|
100
|
1,707
|
1,836
|
1,873
|
|
9.7%
|
2.0%
|
|
17.40
|
18.71
|
7.5%
|
|
1,888
|
0.8%
|
|
|
|
Northeast
|
Top
|
160
|
2,766
|
2,781
|
2,888
|
|
4.4%
|
3.8%
|
|
17.13
|
18.04
|
5.3%
|
|
2,908
|
0.7%
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
128
|
2,211
|
2,289
|
2,343
|
|
6.0%
|
2.4%
|
|
17.14
|
18.27
|
6.6%
|
|
2,361
|
0.8%
|
|
|
|
|
Poor
|
97
|
1,769
|
1,770
|
1,830
|
|
3.4%
|
3.4%
|
|
17.85
|
18.81
|
5.4%
|
|
1,839
|
0.5%
|
|
|
|
W. Central
|
Top
|
166
|
2,964
|
2,967
|
3,053
|
|
3.0%
|
2.9%
|
|
18.46
|
18.44
|
-0.1%
|
|
3,112
|
1.9%
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
138
|
2,500
|
2,503
|
2,589
|
|
3.6%
|
3.4%
|
|
18.65
|
18.75
|
0.5%
|
|
2,619
|
1.2%
|
|
|
|
|
Poor
|
108
|
1,929
|
1,978
|
2,025
|
|
5.0%
|
2.4%
|
|
18.16
|
18.80
|
3.5%
|
|
2,069
|
2.2%
|
|
|
|
Central
|
Top
|
167
|
3,174
|
3,240
|
3,336
|
|
5.1%
|
3.0%
|
|
19.10
|
20.01
|
4.8%
|
|
3,372
|
1.1%
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
138
|
2,683
|
2,763
|
2,828
|
|
5.4%
|
2.4%
|
|
19.35
|
20.42
|
5.5%
|
|
2,866
|
1.3%
|
|
|
|
|
Poor
|
109
|
2,226
|
2,307
|
2,355
|
|
5.8%
|
2.1%
|
|
20.30
|
21.64
|
6.6%
|
|
2,386
|
1.3%
|
|
|
|
Southwest
|
Top
|
167
|
2,860
|
2,700
|
2,811
|
|
-1.7%
|
4.1%
|
|
16.98
|
16.87
|
-0.6%
|
|
2,833
|
0.8%
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
132
|
2,206
|
2,018
|
2,108
|
|
-4.4%
|
4.5%
|
|
16.74
|
15.97
|
-4.6%
|
|
2,137
|
1.4%
|
|
|
|
|
Poor
|
96
|
1,425
|
1,263
|
1,306
|
|
-8.4%
|
3.4%
|
|
14.46
|
13.55
|
-6.3%
|
|
1,323
|
1.3%
|
|
|
|
Southeast
|
Top
|
153
|
2,518
|
2,652
|
2,710
|
|
7.6%
|
2.2%
|
|
16.48
|
17.75
|
7.7%
|
|
2,695
|
-0.6%
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
124
|
2,107
|
2,281
|
2,354
|
|
11.7%
|
3.2%
|
|
17.50
|
18.94
|
8.2%
|
|
2,351
|
-0.1%
|
|
|
|
|
Poor
|
96
|
1,702
|
1,831
|
1,894
|
|
11.3%
|
3.4%
|
|
18.79
|
19.67
|
4.7%
|
|
1,892
|
-0.1%
|
|
|
|
Indiana
|
Top
|
163
|
2,892
|
2,938
|
3,035
|
|
4.9%
|
3.3%
|
|
17.85
|
18.59
|
4.1%
|
|
3,075
|
1.3%
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
134
|
2,382
|
2,434
|
2,509
|
|
5.3%
|
3.1%
|
|
18.06
|
18.79
|
4.0%
|
|
2,539
|
1.2%
|
|
|
|
|
Poor
|
103
|
1,869
|
1,918
|
1,966
|
|
5.2%
|
2.5%
|
|
18.25
|
19.07
|
4.5%
|
|
1,990
|
1.2%
|
|
|
|
|
Trans.2
|
|
6,447
|
6,658
|
6,936
|
|
7.6%
|
4.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,088
|
2.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ending June 2003, the change in land values ranged from a
decline of 8.4% for poor land in the Southwest region to an increase of 11.7%
for average land in the Southeast region. In the Southwest region, the increase
in value during the six month period from December 2002 to June 2003 was not
sufficient to offset earlier reductions. All classes of land in this region
declined for the year ending June 2003. The strongest increases for the year
were in the Southeast region, ranging from 7.6% to 11.7%. This was followed by
the North region with increases ranging from 7.8% to 9.7%.
The highest valued topquality land was in the
Central area, $3,336 per acre. This region was followed by West Central
($3,053), North ($3,037), Northeast ($2,888), Southwest ($2,811), and Southeast
($2,710).
Land value per bushel of estimated average corn yield (land value divided by
bushels) is the highest in the Central region, ranging from $20.01 to $21.64
per bushel. This was followed by the North, Northeast and West Central with
values ranging from $18.04 to $18.81. The Southwest had the lowest land value
per bushel, ranging from $13.55 to $16.87. This region also had the widest
range of values.
Respondents were asked to estimate the value of rural home sites with no accessible
gas line or city utilities and located on a black top or wellmaintained gravel road. The median*** value for fiveacre home sites ranged from $5,000 to $8,500 per acre
(Table 3). Estimated per acre median values of the larger
tracts (10 acres) ranged from $4,750 to $7,500 per acre.
|
|
Table 3. Median value of five-acre
home sites and home sites of ten acres or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 Acres or less for home site
|
|
10 Acres & over for subdivision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North |
5,000 |
5,250 |
6,000 |
6,000 |
|
5,000 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
|
|
|
Northeast |
5,000 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
6,000 |
|
4,500 |
4,500 |
4,500 |
5,000 |
|
|
|
West Central |
5,000 |
5,000 |
5,800 |
6,000 |
|
5,000 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
|
|
|
Central |
6,000 |
6,250 |
7,000 |
8,500 |
|
5,500 |
5,000 |
5,750 |
7,500 |
|
|
|
Southwest |
5,000 |
6,000 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
|
5,000 |
6,000 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
|
|
|
Southeast |
5,000 |
5,000 |
5,500 |
6,000 |
|
4,000 |
4,000 |
5,000 |
4,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
Area Cash Rents
All areas of the state reported increases in cash rent (Table 2). Only
the Central and Southwest region reported a decline in cash rent. In both
regions, the cash rent for poor land declined. The strongest increase in cash
rent occurred in the Southeast region.
|
|
Table 2. Average estimated Indiana
cash rent per acre, (tillable, bare land) 2002 and 2003, Purdue
Land Value Survey, June 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Rent as % of
June Land Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
Top
|
162
|
141
|
143
|
|
1.4%
|
|
0.88
|
0.88
|
|
5.3
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
130
|
113
|
115
|
|
1.8%
|
|
0.88
|
0.88
|
|
5.2
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
Poor
|
100
|
88
|
91
|
|
3.4%
|
|
0.90
|
0.91
|
|
5.3
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
Northeast
|
Top
|
160
|
132
|
138
|
|
4.5%
|
|
0.82
|
0.86
|
|
4.9
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
128
|
104
|
106
|
|
1.9%
|
|
0.81
|
0.83
|
|
4.9
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
Poor
|
97
|
81
|
82
|
|
1.2%
|
|
0.82
|
0.84
|
|
4.9
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
W. Central
|
Top
|
166
|
154
|
158
|
|
2.6%
|
|
0.96
|
0.95
|
|
5.3
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
138
|
131
|
134
|
|
2.3%
|
|
0.98
|
0.97
|
|
5.5
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
Poor
|
108
|
103
|
106
|
|
2.9%
|
|
0.97
|
0.98
|
|
5.6
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
Central
|
Top
|
167
|
156
|
158
|
|
1.3%
|
|
0.94
|
0.95
|
|
4.9
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
138
| |