Ag Economics Seal Purdue University
Agricultural Economics
We are currently under construction and will be moving to a new look and feel website. In the meantime, some of our pages will have the new look, while others will not. For a preview, please visit our new site.
My AgEconSearchContact UsCalendarTextbooks


Programs & Publications
 

Prices & Outlook: Hogs Outlook

October 2005

Hog Producers Say: “Don’t Rock the Boat”

Pork producers must like making money, because they sure are not willing to rock the boat by expanding. The September Hogs and Pigs report from USDA says that pork producers are content keeping numbers about where they have been. In fact, the breeding herd has changed less that one percent in each of the last five quarterly reports. That is the first time ever to go this long with such small changes. However, the trend may be broken as producers are finally hinting at some expansion in the distant future.

The nation's breeding herd and market herds remained unchanged. Slaughter numbers are expected to be up only one percent in October and November, and nearly unchanged in December, January and February.

The number of sows farrowed this summer was unchanged, but pigs per litter were up one percent. For the fall, producers intend to keep farrowings unchanged. The hint toward expansion however, shows up in the winter when farrowing intentions are expected to move upward, but just by one percent.

Breeding herds in individual states were pretty stable with the exceptions of Illinois which was up five percent and Iowa which was up four percent. Notable declines occurred in Minnesota with a two percent reduction in their breeding herd and Indiana with a three per cent reduction.

Pork supplies are expected to be up about one percent this fall and winter, and then up about two percent next spring and summer. However, with increasing population and strong exports, the available supply per person will be little changed from year-previous levels.

Pork trade continues to be the featured story along with lack of expansion. Data through July show exports to be up 26 percent from the same period one year ago. This year, pork exports have represented a record 13 percent of our production. Imports are down by about ten percent, so the net affect is that pork available to U.S. consumers is actually down around three percent so far this year. No wonder prices have remained strong!

Hog prices on a liveweight basis are expected to average in the very high $40s over the coming 12 months. In the last three months of this year, prices are expected to average in the $45 to $49 range, although daily fall lows could drop to around $45 in late October and early November. Prices in the winter are expected to be about $1 higher. Second quarter 2006 prices are expected to be in the very high $40s with summer prices in the very high $40s to low $50s.

With current corn and soybean meal prices, costs of production for farrow-to-finish production is estimated to be near $40 per live hundredweight for the next 12 months. This means that margins will be about $7 to $9 per hundredweight which is about $2 better than estimates from late summer.

The current period of profitability began in the 2 nd quarter of 2004 and is now expected to continue at least through the summer of 2006. If so, this means at least 10 consecutive quarters of positive margins. The last time that occurred was from 1985 to 1988 when the hog market registered 12 consecutive quarters of margins in the black.

The current long run period of profitable prices is a market signal that the world would like U.S. producers to loosen up a bit and get some expansion underway. Of course U.S. producers are hesitant because Canada is where the sow expansion has been since 1998, and there remains uncertainty regarding how long pork export strength will remain if the BSE beef testing issue is resolved with Japan . There is additional uncertainly on the costs of production with rising building costs, rising interest rates, and rising and unpredictable energy prices.

In summary, the market is asking U.S. producers to expand, but so far, the response has been, NO! Are our producers also sending the signal that they would rather have producers in other countries expand, or has there just been too much uncertainty to make the first move? We need to make up our minds in the next six months, and my bet is that U.S. producers will vote for greater expansion.

Chris Hurt
Purdue University
October 3, 2005

 


 


Undergraduate
Graduate
Programs & Publications

Prices & Outlook

Programs

Publications

Agricultural Policy

Additional Resources


Centers
Directory
News
Alumni



Announcements


November 24, 2009

Introducing a Special Issue of Agricultural Economics on the World Food Crisis of 2007-08More

Now accepting applications for Natural Resources Leadership Development InstituteMore

Considering becoming an Agricultural Economics student? Please visit our Future Student pages.More

USDA National Needs Fellowships In The Economics Of Alternative Energy are available. For more information, download the pdf. More



Agricultural Economics

Purdue University College of Agriculture
  Ag Econ Home | Undergraduate | Graduate
Programs & Publications | Centers | Directory | News
MEL | Search | Support | Contact Us
Agricultural Economics
College of Agriculture
Purdue University


Copyright © 2007, Purdue University. All rights reserved.

It is the policy of Purdue University that all persons have equal opportunity and access to its educational programs, services, activities, and facilities without regard to race, religion, color, sex, age, national origin or ancestry, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, disability or status as a veteran.

Purdue University is an Affirmative Action employer.
This material may be available in alternative formats.