April 2002
Larry DeBoer
Professor
Agricultural Economics
Purdue University
Here's
a PDF version of this column.
Here's a link
to all the Capital Comments columns.
One of my favorite books from recent years
is Thomas Friedman’s The Lexus and the Olive Tree. Friedman is the Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist from the New
York Times. His book is
about globalization, the ever-more-interconnected international economy.
Friedman is good at thinking up clever terms
for abstract ideas. One that
Indiana should pay attention to is “golden straightjacket.”
The golden straightjacket is the set of rules about property, banking,
trade and taxes that businesses look for when they decide where to invest.
“Golden” because adopting these rules leads to economic growth.
Profits are higher and more certain in places that obey these rules, so
businesses invest, creating more jobs and higher incomes. “Straightjacket”
because there’s not much room for any state or nation to deviate from the
rules. Wearing the straightjacket
can get very uncomfortable.
Indiana’s tax restructuring debate is
about how tight we want to wear the golden straightjacket.
Parts of our tax structure break the rules, and they probably keep
businesses from investing in our state.
Almost everywhere, property is taxed based
on market value, on its predicted selling price.
Not in Indiana. We base our
property tax on our own assessing rules. Businesses
that know how to calculate their property’s tax value in the other states must
learn different rules if they locate in Indiana. Our assessment rules are more subjective than market value
rules. That means that even
businesses that understand them can’t know exactly how they will be applied.
Some businesses surely say “why bother?” and go somewhere else.
We’re taken the first steps toward solving
the assessment problem. The new
rules for our ongoing reassessment are closer to market value.
The rules are not quite market value, though, and it’s not clear how
well the new rules will be applied. The
straightjacket requires market value, done well.
Hardly anyone taxes inventories with the
property tax. Indiana does. Businesses might consider putting their goods distribution
facilities along Indiana’s many interstates.
When they find out that they’ll pay a property tax on these goods, some
decide to go somewhere else. The
straightjacket requires that we not tax inventories.
Just about everywhere, corporations are
taxed based on the profits they earn. Indiana
has profits taxes, but we also have a gross income tax.
It taxes corporations on their total revenue, whether they earned profits
or not. Most start-up businesses
lose money for a few years before they become profitable.
In other states, they don’t pay tax.
In Indiana, they just might. Many
start-ups decide to start somewhere else. The straightjacket requires that we
tax profits, not gross revenues.
Making these changes would reduce the taxes
collected from businesses. That
might help business investment too. Though
Indiana is a low tax state, our business taxes are a little higher than our
neighbors’.
Now for the main problem.
Tax cuts must be paid for, and that can be done only two ways: spend
less, or raise some other tax. We
could spend less, but businesses also look for good education, good roads and
utilities, good police and fire protection.
Places that don’t provide these things don’t get economic growth,
even if their taxes are low.
Or, we could raise some other tax. We could invent some new business taxes, but they might
discourage business investment as much as the taxes we’re changing.
That leaves taxes on households, like the individual income tax or the
sales tax. That’s what makes the
golden straightjacket so uncomfortable.
The trouble with the golden straightjacket is that the uncomfortable tightening comes first. Most people would pay more in household taxes. The golden part comes later. Investment increases only after businesses see that Indiana has changed its tax structure. It’s a gamble. Most people pay higher taxes, but it’s no sure thing that most people would benefit from the added jobs and higher incomes. With Indiana lagging farther and farther behind the rest of the country, though, it may be time to take a chance.